Circular Reasoning

I was reading Charles Stross’ novelette A Colder War recently and was struck by its mention of a “Great Filter” in reference to the seeming lack of intelligent, technological life in the universe.  A search for the term quickly showed that it arose from a discussion of the Fermi Paradox by Robin Hanson.  I have a few problems with the arguments Hanson makes in the discussed essay.

The most obvious is that Earth may well have already been colonized by extraterrestrial life.  Chemolithotrophic bacteria are thought to be terrestrial, but it’s been speculated that they exist elsewhere and may have originated somewhere other than our planet.  Perhaps the kind of life that dominates the universe is so familiar to us that we don’t recognize it under our noses.

A somewhat more subtle issue is with the assertion that we’ve had great success understanding the universe without referring to complex processes of life.  Well… sort of.  Interestingly, Carl Sagan addresses this issue in fiction in his novel <u>Contact</u>, in which a conservation with an alien being indicates that some of the things we can see in the night sky are the beginning stages of a vast engineering project.  We never noticed because we derived our ideas about how astronomical processes work from our observations – and thus those observations necessarily do not contradict our ideas.

I remember reading another author who suggested that we could observe distant galaxies and possibly determine whether it had advanced life by checking the number of supernovae in them against our ideas of their natural frequency – if there were far fewer, that galaxy contained advanced life (because it was stopping them) and if it had far more, it had contained advanced life (because it found a way to use stars as weapons).

The argument only holds if we make certain assumptions – clearly, that advanced life could and would affect the behavior of stars – but also that most galaxies are devoid of life.  Since our grasp of the internal physics of stars is currently derived by what we can deduce by observing large numbers of them from a vast distance (in both space and time), if many galaxies contain organisms that alter the supernova rate our understanding of what’s ‘natural’ will be incorrect.

It’s not obvious to me that moderately advanced life would have effects that we could detect at a distance, given our scientific and technological limitations.  But I strongly suspect that sufficiently advanced life could be leaving its signature all over the place without our awareness, because it determined what we consider to be natural.  Can a colony of bacteria really distinguish between a forest and a strip mall?


5 Responses to “Circular Reasoning”

  1. I believe part of the point is that given the time scales involved and even with the speed of light as a hard limitation it only takes one civilization bucking the trend and actively colonizing the galaxy to have the entire galaxy filled with them after <a million years.

    • though i suppose if this darwinian selection occurred for a “silent type” (one that doesn’t modify things visibly) civilization it would explain things.

  2. “The most obvious is that Earth may well have already been colonized by extraterrestrial life”
    Hanson has often discussed panspermia.

    As for what past alien civilizations would be expected to leave behind, Hanson says “trash“, in a podcast with Seth Shostak, who is mentioned in the criticism section of the linked wiki article.

    • I don’t disagree with the argument that the absence of obvious technological detritus strongly argues against the idea that a species anything like ourselves has failed to colonize the galaxy.

      I suspect there are good reasons that’s unlikely.

      What I disagree with is the idea that this ‘Great Filter’ must somehow prevent matter from arranging itself into life.

  3. Ian tregilis’ just wrote a brilliant book with a very similar premise, called “coldest war”, except that the filter forces (eldritch eidolons) tries to eliminate conscious life instead of technologically advanced life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: