It’s not a matter of the First Amendment, people…

I’ve been reading about the umpteen-ring circus that is the “Occupy [Location]” Movement, and generally I’ve been highly amused.  They’re like the Tea Party, as every media hack keeps repeating, but without the organization and coherence.  It’s pretty sad when the TP beats you on both of those qualities, too.

While I’d like to be sympathetic with their complaints, I find their analysis lacking.  There doesn’t seem to be any sense in which they blame the unholy alliance of Big Business and government, just BB.  There’s no criticism of members of the public who bought homes they couldn’t afford.  And much of their protests deal with the standard young-lefty complaints such as the lack of universal health care.

But what actually gets my goat is nonsense like the following (taken from the Miami Herald’s coverage):

“First Amendment rights, First Amendment rights,” one woman shouted as she was handcuffed and led away to nearby police vans.

Don’t these people know what the First Amendment actually guarantees?  For that matter, doesn’t it occur to any of them that monopolizing public spaces, in ways that permanently damage them, while soaking the surroundings in urine, isn’t all that great a way to make people sympathetic to their cause?  (The hygienic concerns surrounding the protests are quite real and increasingly serious, according to my sources.)  Not to mention better at not getting them arrested.  It’s just not that hard to craft a protest that doesn’t unfairly inconvenience people working at the target – those sorts of placard-holding and chanting are tolerated.  It’s not the speech that people are objecting to, it’s the blockading and gross discourtesy of the Occupy movement.

When I compare them to, say, the Civil Rights Movement of the US, I feel sick.

4 Responses to “It’s not a matter of the First Amendment, people…”

  1. It’s possible you only hear about a sanitized version of the civil rights movement. I recall others saying recently that protest marches also broke the law by going places they weren’t allowed. And of course there were a lot of riots around that time as well. Spiro Agnew was put on the ticket partly because of his response to H. Rap Brown’s riot.

  2. I’m aware that people’s actions during the Civil Rights Struggle varied wildly, but the best actions taken during that time represent one of the triumphs of human civilization thus far: they are the one and only time that civil disobedience has been successfully practiced by a large number of people. ‘Successfully’ in both senses of the word. Gandhi’s movement, as I was rather surprised to learn, doesn’t actually count.

    I’m not seeing anything in the Occupy [Location] movement that comes close to even the mediocre aspects of the CRS.

  3. […] 15 Things I Learned About the Tea Party From Occupy Wall Street Fear and Envy « Neptunus Lex It’s not a matter of the First Amendment, people… « Occlu.. Slumming is fun. « the Hyacinth Girl YOU SHALL NOT COVET « ABYSSUS ABYSSUM INVOCAT / […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: