A Stupid Argument
One of the most common arguments I’ve seen people bring up in criticisms of ( conservatism / Ayn Rand’s Objectivism / whatever strawman they’re trying to tear down to show how potent their political positions are ) is the American interstate highway system.
You’ve probably heard or read the objection yourself; it usually goes something like this: “You use the interstate system and products shipped on it – shouldn’t you be boycotting the evil governmental interference in the market?”
I’d like to suggest a reply to such people. They presumably contract for the services of various utility companies – electricity, water, oil or natural gas, and so on. In the United States, these utilities are almost always, to the best of my knowledge, privately owned companies.
Shouldn’t these advocates of government influence in the markets be boycotting the evil corporations trying to dominate their lives, and refuse to use utilities until such time as they can be nationalized into government services?
As for the argument that many of the people who have shaped the technological and sociological structure of our society had at least some public schooling, and the government subsidizes many kinds of education, therefore our wonderful society is utterly dependent upon government activity… well, I don’t think any argument is effective against Duckspeak.